Uber Employs Taxi Drivers, California Labor Commission finds

Uber Employs Taxi Drivers, California Labor Commission finds

The California Labor Commission said that a driver for Uber should be classified as an employee, not an independent contractor.

The ruling ordered Uber to reimburse Barbara Ann Berwick, a former Uber driver, $4,152.20 in expenses and other costs for the eight-week period or so that she worked as a driver for the service last year.

Uber has long claimed to be a technology company, not a taxi company even if its original name was Ubercab. But the labor commission found that it functioned as taxi company and as an employer.

“Defendants hold themselves out as nothing more than a neutral technological platform, designed simply to enable drivers and passengers to transact the business of transportation,” the Labor Commisson wrote about Uber. “The reality, however, is that defendants are involved in every aspect of the operation.”

According to the New York Times, in the course of driving for Uber between July and September 2014, working 60 to 80 hours a week, she said, she earned about $11,000 before expenses and taxes.

“If you work it out, if I didn’t get compensated for expenses, I’d be working for less than minimum wage,” Ms. Berwick told the Times. So she said filed with the California Labor Commission for overtime, expenses and interest, setting in motion the events that led to the ruling.

 


City finds Queens unwelcoming

The City is trying to move the latest lawsuit attacking its failure to regulate Uber out of Queens.

In the lawsuit, four lenders who finance the purchase of taxi medallions argue that the city and its TLC  are letting ride-share companies such as Uber pick up passengers who hail cars using smartphone apps, which is tantamount to accepting street hails. By letting Uber and others operate freely, the city is depriving medallions holders of their exclusive right to respond to street hails, the lawsuit alleges.

The City says that the case should be in Manhattan, where a similar case has been filed, because the Mayor’s principal place of business is there. Lawyers for the plaintiffs called the City’s motion “judge shopping.” They note also that the TLC’s largest office is in Queens and that a plurality of taxi drivers live in Queens.


Blind Suing the Rich

Uber is facing a new legal challenge: a lawuit by blind passengers accusing it of violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act because it will not transport guide dogs. U.S. Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins in San Jose, California, said the plaintiffs could pursue a claim that Uber is a “travel service” subject to potential liability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Uber is Font of Information — If on its own terms

Uber, which has recently had its NYC bases suspended for refusing to provide data to regulators, has released a font of information based on its own survey of drivers it employs.

Uber claims that since its launch  in 2012, it has attracted over 16,000 drivers to its app-based taxi service in San Francisco alone.  Over 11,000 are still active, the company says, which is more than the number of traditional cabdrivers in the city. “Many” of these drivers are part-timers working fewer than 34 hours a week.

The company also says that its drivers earn more than other taxi drivers in the various cities in which the company operates.

Newsweek points out that “the number of drivers who responded to the poll was startlingly small,” especially when compared with the 160,000 drivers the company says it employs. Just  601 drivers across 20 cities responded to the study. But based on those who chose to respond, Uber determined that 78% of drivers are satisfied with the Uber platform and that their and the average hourly earnings are $19, though some drivers in New York have an earnings of almost $30 per hour.  The company says its drivers are attracted by “work-life balance” and the ability to be one’s own boss.

Uber sent its survey was sent to about 5,464 drivers, meaning about 4,863 drivers declined to reply or indicated otherwise that they were not willing to take the survey. Had all the drivers replied, the survey would represent about 3.4 percent of Uber’s more than 160,00 U.S. drivers, Newsweek said.  Many drivers were wary about answering honestly questions about their own employer.

Newsweek’s skepticism is more than justified. Indeed, it’s odd that Uber would publish data about its business based on any kind of driver survey since Uber presumably knows exactly how much its drivers earn and how much they work.

“This report is designed to impress American mayors and disguise the predatory nature of Uber’s relationship to its drivers — the company collects money, while the drivers accept all of the risk,” Dave Sutton, spokesman for a public campaign by the Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association, told the Washington Post. The Post also reports that In December, 162,037 “active drivers” completed at least four or more trips for the service. The number of new drivers signing up has doubled every six months for the past two years.

Here is a link to the full report.
Uber’s own summary of the study can be seen here.


Uber Appeal Denied – Must ‘Fess Up unless Commish gives a pass

A New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission judge has rejected Uber’s appeal of an order issued two weeks ago suspending its base licenses. The car service must now turn over data on all trips for its 12,700 car fleet, the Daily News reports.
But just as the original order never went into effect — the TLC immediately stayed it when Uber said it would appeal– Uber says that the suspensions will somehow have no effect on its operations. The company is expected to petition TLC chairwoman Meera Joshi to set aside the order.
A TLC judge suspended five of Uber’s six bases in New York City after on January 7. Unlike taxi drivers who are made to serve their suspensions immediately, Uber was allowed to operate with a temporary license pending the appeal. Now, Uber may still operate by resort to its sixth base. All of Uber’s bases are virtual in any event– that is, none of Uber’s cars ever have to park there, or even visit.


South Carolina bans Uber, but Gov shows Luv

The Uber taxi service has been ordered by South Carolina regulators to cease operations in the state. But it says it is the process of seeking permission to legally do business there.
“We have challenged the order and remain committed to providing South Carolinians with greater opportunity and choice,” the company said. Meanwhile, Gov. Nikki Haley called for the order to be lifted, saying Uber provides economic opportunities and consumer choice to people of South Carolina.

Uber hires

Yahoo News reports that Uber is adding to its roster of ex-public officials. The taxi app service has just hired Michael Allegretti, a one-time congressional candidate, political consultant and Manhattan Institute scholar.  Locally, Allegretti joins Matthew Wing, previously Governor Anthony Cuomo’s press secretary, and former TLC official Ashwini Chhabra, whose hiring last fall seems to be under investigation by the city based on suspicions that he had been secretly reporting to Uber while still working for the commission.


China Bans Uber

China has banned drivers of private cars from offering services through ride-hailing apps, according to the Guardian and other reports.
Only licensed taxis may use ride-hailing apps, the ministry of transport announced on Friday. Such apps are hugely popular in China, and the ministry said it needed to protect passengers as well as, it seems, licensed taxi drivers.
“While we encourage innovation, we prohibit private cars from using platforms to participate in the ’hired car’ business,” said a ministry announcement. It said companies that operate ride-hailing apps will be required to make sure no unlicensed drivers use them.
The ruling could be a setback for Uber, the Guardian says, noting that the company faces bans of other challenges in South Korea, India, Europe, California and other markets for using drivers who lack taxi licenses.
Fast Company reports that Uber’s operations are facing suspension in cities around the world, including in France, India and Spain, as well as New York City– to name just a few. The company is marshaling a small army of policy staffers to do battle with local authorities, Fast Company says.
Uber, however, has a pattern of coming into markets without licenses, establishing a demand for its services, and then, if necessary, extracting concessions from regulators allowing it to operate lawfully, but close to its own terms.
China, the Guardia says, already has ride hailing apps like Didi Dache, backed by internet giant Tencent, and Kuaidi Dache, backed by rival Alibaba Group. Those services are used mostly by taxi companies.

A Shut and Open Case

The NYC TLC has suspended five of the six Uber-owned dispatch bases in the City. But just as quickly, it lifted the suspension when Uber appealed (or perhaps simply said it would appeal).  


Two days ago the TLC suspended the bases after the company refused to submit their electronic trip records to the Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Uber has refused to comply with a TLC directive that it turn over the data, saying it would violate their constitutional rights and share trade secrets. The agency needs the data to make decisions that will affect the taxi industry, as well as investigate passenger complaints.


According to TLC flak Allan Fromberg, as quoted by New York Business Journal: “The suspension wasn’t technically lifted, but I’m now told that Uber submitted an appeal request very late yesterday, and our policy is to issue them a temporary permit allowing them to operate until the appeal is decided…. We had mentioned that this would be the case if they appealed the … decision.”


One Uber base remained open which apparently allowing Uber operations to continue unaffected in the meantime.


The Great Medallion Crash of 2014

Taxi medallion prices, after rising continually for many years, are continuing to fall, with app-based hailing services like Uber taking the blame. The New York Times reports that in NYC individual taxi medallions, whose owners must drive a taxi for roughly 180 shifts per year, fell to $805,000, down 23 percent from 2013’s peak of $1.05 million. Corporate medallions, which may be owned in fleets, traded on average at $950,000, down 28 percent from their peak.

In New York, yellow taxi business has been cut not just by Uber but by the green or outer borough taxis.  There is a strong feeling among owners of yellow medallions that the TLC is failing to enforce rules that protect their traditional and investment-backed expectation that they will have the exclusive right to street hails, at least in Manhattan.  

The Times reports that medallions are barely selling at all in Chicago and Boston as financing has dried up. 


Search
Page 1 of 3123

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550   300-135   350-060   300-206   200-125  , 300-075   AWS-SYSOPS   200-101   070-461   9L0-066   JN0-102   210-060   000-106   200-125  , 500-260   300-206   70-412   74-678   70-178   PEGACPBA71V1   210-260   CRISC   EX200   70-413   220-902   ITILFND   100-101   LX0-103   400-051   70-410   70-417   JK0-022   70-413   352-001   AWS-SYSOPS   ADM-201   300-115   640-692   000-080   ICGB   70-463   ICBB   70-410   70-487