A few members of the City Council, apparently with a lot of time on their hands, have proposed legislation that would require a “panic button” be installed in the backseat of taxis. It’s a bonehead idea at best. But it’s also vaguely racist and generally slanderous. It should be swiftly and emphatically abandoned.
The bill is sponsored by Laurie A. Cumbo, a Brooklyn Democrat, who says she is promoting safety. And no one is against safety, right? The problem is that a taxicab—at least for the passenger—is already an exceedingly safe place. But Cumbo seems entirely unaware of the facts. While in the last year or so there has been one highly publicized sexual assault conviction of a taxi driver and another widely reported allegation. But these are one-in-a-million events.
Overall, the fact is that taxi drivers are unusually law-abiding. They are arrested at a fraction of the rate of the general public. They are almost never convicted of a violent crime. And in those exceedingly rare cases, the crime is nearly always off-duty, not against a passenger. Inside a taxi, the passenger can see the driver’s name and his license number. There is an electronic record of who is driving the cab. While anything is possible, all of these factors make driver-on-passenger assaults exceedingly unlikely as well as historically extremely rare. All told, taxi drivers are arrested at less than 1/3 the rate of the public at large (even though they have much more contact than average with the police).
Cumbo is immune to these facts. She told the New York Times, “Once you step into a cab and the doors are locked, you are very much at the will of the driver.”
So the panic button idea is itself based on panic, not real danger. If that were the only thing at stake, it would be easy to laugh off as just another silly piece of legislation. But that is not all. The panic button idea is an insult to the hardworking, mostly immigrants taxi drivers who do not deserve to be portrayed as predators-in-waiting.
The worst part is that the TLC, while not backing Cumbo’s bill, has spread similar panic itself. I am a lawyer is two long-running class action lawsuits where the TLC has adopted Cumbo’s unbaked logic. One case is based on the TLC policy of suspending cab drivers who are arrested (not convicted) of a crime. The other is based on the TLC policy of revoking the license of cabdrivers who are convicted. In both cases the TLC acts even if the crime is totally off-duty and without any regard for the driver’s overall record.
In both cases, the TLC has defended its policy with statements very much like Cumbo’s. That taxi drivers are often foreign born and dark-skinned makes this fear easier to sell.
The TLC’s legal position is that they cannot be bothered with the facts or even an investigation. The TLC says it must act first and question later because these cabbies might be dangerous—even if very few, if any, of them actually are dangerous.
When pressed, the TLC has admitted the truth. Charles Fraser, then the general counsel of the TLC, admitted in a sworn statement that over a four- year period, just two taxi drivers were convicted of “violence related” offenses. It is not two per year; it’s two in four years. Fraser later testified that neither occurred while the driver was on duty. And to say something is “violence-related” does not even mean the act was actually violent as most people understand the term. Also, you have to consider the context. There are roughly 100,000 taxi drivers. So if one (or even two) per year is convicted of a serious offense, it really means that cabdrivers as a group are still extraordinarily non-violent.
If anyone in a taxi is at risk, it’s the driver. According to the federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration, taxi drivers are between 21 to 33 times more likely to be murdered than other workers. If the City Council is looking for problems to solve, here is a real one. But a taxi driver assaulting a passenger is a non-problem. So let’s install those panic buttons, but only after crime everywhere else is eradicated and just after we put diapers on horses.
The New York Times has a Christmas Day editorial saying that app-based taxi services like Uber and Lyft need to do a better job of background-checking their drivers. It cites a single incident– albeit one that has grabbed headlines– in which an Uber Driver in New Delhi was accused of raping a passenger.
Uber, for one, says its checks are superior to those conducted by taxi regulators. Uber naturally does an Internet-based check, not a fingerprint based search used by at least some regulators.
What this editorial and many like it miss is that an aversion to regulation, background checks included, is the whole point of app-based services. They say that driver reviews regulate the system and weed out bad drivers.
000-017 000-080 000-089 000-104 000-105 000-106 070-461 100-101 100-105 , 100-105 , 101 101-400 102-400 1V0-601 1Y0-201 1Z0-051 1Z0-060 1Z0-061 1Z0-144 1z0-434 1Z0-803 1Z0-804 1z0-808 200-101 200-120 200-125 , 200-125 , 200-310 200-355 210-060 210-065 210-260 220-801 220-802 220-901 220-902 2V0-620 2V0-621 2V0-621D 300-070 300-075 300-101 300-115 300-135 3002 300-206 300-208 300-209 300-320 350-001 350-018 350-029 350-030 350-050 350-060 350-080 352-001 400-051 400-101 400-201 500-260 640-692 640-911 640-916 642-732 642-999 700-501 70-177 70-178 70-243 70-246 70-270 70-346 70-347 70-410 70-411 70-412 70-413 70-417 70-461 70-462 70-463 70-480 70-483 70-486 70-487 70-488 70-532 70-533 70-534 70-980 74-678 810-403 9A0-385 9L0-012 9L0-066 ADM-201 AWS-SYSOPS C_TFIN52_66 c2010-652 c2010-657 CAP CAS-002 CCA-500 CISM CISSP CRISC EX200 EX300 HP0-S42 ICBB ICGB ITILFND JK0-022 JN0-102 JN0-360 LX0-103 LX0-104 M70-101 MB2-704 MB2-707 MB5-705 MB6-703 N10-006 NS0-157 NSE4 OG0-091 OG0-093 PEGACPBA71V1 PMP PR000041 SSCP SY0-401 VCP550 300-135 350-060 300-206 200-125 , 300-075 AWS-SYSOPS 200-101 070-461 9L0-066 JN0-102 210-060 000-106 200-125 , 500-260 300-206 70-412 74-678 70-178 PEGACPBA71V1 210-260 CRISC EX200 70-413 220-902 ITILFND 100-101 LX0-103 400-051 70-410 70-417 JK0-022 70-413 352-001 AWS-SYSOPS ADM-201 300-115 640-692 000-080 ICGB 70-463 ICBB 70-410 70-487