Panic Button? How about a Clue Button, Instead?

Panic Button? How about a Clue Button, Instead?

A few members of the City Council, apparently with a lot of time on their hands, have proposed legislation that would require a “panic button” be installed in the backseat of taxis. It’s a bonehead idea at best. But it’s also vaguely racist and generally slanderous. It should be swiftly and emphatically abandoned.

The bill is sponsored by Laurie A. Cumbo, a Brooklyn Democrat, who says she is promoting safety. And no one is against safety, right? The problem is that a taxicab—at least for the passenger—is already an exceedingly safe place. But Cumbo seems entirely unaware of the facts. While in the last year or so there has been one highly publicized sexual assault conviction of a taxi driver and another widely reported allegation. But these are one-in-a-million events.

Overall, the fact is that taxi drivers are unusually law-abiding. They are arrested at a fraction of the rate of the general public. They are almost never convicted of a violent crime. And in those exceedingly rare cases, the crime is nearly always off-duty, not against a passenger. Inside a taxi, the passenger can see the driver’s name and his license number. There is an electronic record of who is driving the cab. While anything is possible, all of these factors make driver-on-passenger assaults exceedingly unlikely as well as historically extremely rare. All told, taxi drivers are arrested at less than 1/3 the rate of the public at large (even though they have much more contact than average with the police).

Cumbo is immune to these facts. She told the New York Times, “Once you step into a cab and the doors are locked, you are very much at the will of the driver.”

So the panic button idea is itself based on panic, not real danger. If that were the only thing at stake, it would be easy to laugh off as just another silly piece of legislation. But that is not all. The panic button idea is an insult to the hardworking, mostly immigrants taxi drivers who do not deserve to be portrayed as predators-in-waiting.

The worst part is that the TLC, while not backing Cumbo’s bill, has spread similar panic itself. I am a lawyer is two long-running class action lawsuits where the TLC has adopted Cumbo’s unbaked logic. One case is based on the TLC policy of suspending cab drivers who are arrested (not convicted) of a crime. The other is based on the TLC policy of revoking the license of cabdrivers who are convicted. In both cases the TLC acts even if the crime is totally off-duty and without any regard for the driver’s overall record.

In both cases, the TLC has defended its policy with statements very much like Cumbo’s. That taxi drivers are often foreign born and dark-skinned makes this fear easier to sell.

The TLC’s legal position is that they cannot be bothered with the facts or even an investigation. The TLC says it must act first and question later because these cabbies might be dangerous—even if very few, if any, of them actually are dangerous.

When pressed, the TLC has admitted the truth. Charles Fraser, then the general counsel of the TLC, admitted in a sworn statement that over a four- year period, just two taxi drivers were convicted of “violence related” offenses. It is not two per year; it’s two in four years. Fraser later testified that neither occurred while the driver was on duty. And to say something is “violence-related” does not even mean the act was actually violent as most people understand the term. Also, you have to consider the context. There are roughly 100,000 taxi drivers. So if one (or even two) per year is convicted of a serious offense, it really means that cabdrivers as a group are still extraordinarily non-violent.

If anyone in a taxi is at risk, it’s the driver. According to the federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration, taxi drivers are between 21 to 33 times more likely to be murdered than other workers. If the City Council is looking for problems to solve, here is a real one. But a taxi driver assaulting a passenger is a non-problem. So let’s install those panic buttons, but only after crime everywhere else is eradicated and just after we put diapers on horses.


Check This!

The New York Times has a Christmas Day editorial saying that app-based taxi services like Uber and Lyft need to do a better job of background-checking their drivers. It cites a single incident– albeit one that has grabbed headlines– in which an Uber Driver in New Delhi was accused of raping a passenger.  

Uber, for one, says its checks are superior to those conducted by taxi regulators. Uber naturally does an Internet-based check, not a fingerprint based search used by at least some regulators.

What this editorial and many like it miss is that an aversion to regulation, background checks included, is the whole point of app-based services. They say that driver reviews regulate the system and weed out bad drivers. 


Search

000-017   000-080   000-089   000-104   000-105   000-106   070-461   100-101   100-105  , 100-105  , 101   101-400   102-400   1V0-601   1Y0-201   1Z0-051   1Z0-060   1Z0-061   1Z0-144   1z0-434   1Z0-803   1Z0-804   1z0-808   200-101   200-120   200-125  , 200-125  , 200-310   200-355   210-060   210-065   210-260   220-801   220-802   220-901   220-902   2V0-620   2V0-621   2V0-621D   300-070   300-075   300-101   300-115   300-135   3002   300-206   300-208   300-209   300-320   350-001   350-018   350-029   350-030   350-050   350-060   350-080   352-001   400-051   400-101   400-201   500-260   640-692   640-911   640-916   642-732   642-999   700-501   70-177   70-178   70-243   70-246   70-270   70-346   70-347   70-410   70-411   70-412   70-413   70-417   70-461   70-462   70-463   70-480   70-483   70-486   70-487   70-488   70-532   70-533   70-534   70-980   74-678   810-403   9A0-385   9L0-012   9L0-066   ADM-201   AWS-SYSOPS   C_TFIN52_66   c2010-652   c2010-657   CAP   CAS-002   CCA-500   CISM   CISSP   CRISC   EX200   EX300   HP0-S42   ICBB   ICGB   ITILFND   JK0-022   JN0-102   JN0-360   LX0-103   LX0-104   M70-101   MB2-704   MB2-707   MB5-705   MB6-703   N10-006   NS0-157   NSE4   OG0-091   OG0-093   PEGACPBA71V1   PMP   PR000041   SSCP   SY0-401   VCP550   300-135   350-060   300-206   200-125  , 300-075   AWS-SYSOPS   200-101   070-461   9L0-066   JN0-102   210-060   000-106   200-125  , 500-260   300-206   70-412   74-678   70-178   PEGACPBA71V1   210-260   CRISC   EX200   70-413   220-902   ITILFND   100-101   LX0-103   400-051   70-410   70-417   JK0-022   70-413   352-001   AWS-SYSOPS   ADM-201   300-115   640-692   000-080   ICGB   70-463   ICBB   70-410   70-487